Business
Tech Firms Adopt 72-Hour Working Week
The development of artificial intelligence has led technology companies to require extensive working hours from their employees, a move that, according to experts, carries potential risks.
Rilla's recruitment website boasts a vibrant design, showcasing images of young employees and featuring slogans like "insane speed", "infinite curiosity", and "customer obsession" to attract potential candidates.

A closer look reveals a range of benefits, including competitive pay, complimentary meals, gym membership, and health and dental care, but a caveat is also presented.
Each job listing includes a notice stating that applicants should only apply if they are willing to work approximately 70 hours per week in person with a team of ambitious individuals in New York City.
Rilla is a New York-based tech firm that specializes in AI-powered systems for monitoring sales representatives during client interactions.
The company has become synonymous with a fast-paced work culture, often referred to as 996, hustle culture, or grindcore, which emphasizes long working hours.
The term 996 refers to a typical work schedule of 9am to 9pm, six days a week, which can be demanding for many individuals.
However, according to Will Gao, Rilla's head of growth, the company's 120 employees do not view this schedule as burdensome.
Gao states that Rilla seeks individuals with characteristics similar to those of Olympian athletes, including obsession and infinite ambition.
He believes that these individuals are driven to achieve remarkable things and have fun while doing so.
Gao emphasizes that while the work hours are generally long, there is no strict structure in place.

He explains that if he has an idea he wants to work on, he will often continue working until 2 or 3 am and then arrive at the office at noon the next day.
This approach has gained popularity in the tech industry over the past few years, largely due to the rapid development of artificial intelligence.
Significant investments are being made in AI ventures, and companies are under pressure to develop and monetize AI solutions quickly, leading to a culture of long working hours.
The 996 culture originated in China about a decade ago, when tech companies and start-ups adopted this approach to drive growth and innovation.
Influential figures such as Jack Ma, the founder of Alibaba.com, advocated for this culture, citing its benefits for personal and professional growth.
Ma wrote in a blog post that being able to work 996 is a blessing, and he believes it is a common trait among successful individuals.
He stated that many entrepreneurs, artists, scientists, and politicians work long hours because they are passionate about their work.
Ma added that their dedication is not driven by perseverance, but by a deep passion for their chosen careers.
Another proponent of the 996 culture was Richard Liu, the founder of JD.com, who criticized what he saw as a declining work ethic in China.

In a 2019 email, Liu wrote that individuals who do not work hard are not his "brothers", sparking controversy and criticism.
The backlash against the 996 culture led to a wave of online complaints and eventually prompted a legal crackdown in 2021, as authorities addressed concerns about labor laws and worker exploitation.
Although the 996 culture is still present in China, its advocates have become less vocal, with some exceptions, such as Qu Jing, a former head of public relations at Baidu, who defended the culture in a series of videos posted on social media in 2024.
Despite the controversy, the 996 culture still has supporters in other parts of the world.
Narayana Murthy, the founder of Infosys, expressed admiration for China's adoption of the 996 culture, stating that hard work is essential for success.
The US tech industry's embrace of the 996 culture can be attributed to the rapid development of AI and the need for companies to quickly develop and market AI-powered solutions.
According to Adrian Kinnersley, who runs recruitment businesses in Europe and North America, the 996 culture is prevalent in AI companies that receive venture capital funding and are racing to develop products.
Magnus Müller, a young entrepreneur and co-founder of Browser-Use, an AI start-up, believes that working long hours is necessary to solve complex problems and achieve success in the competitive AI industry.
Müller states that his company is developing tools to enhance AI applications, and he is looking for individuals who share his mentality and are willing to work long hours to achieve their goals.

Browser-Use is currently recruiting, and Müller emphasizes that he seeks people who are passionate about their work and willing to immerse themselves in complex problems.
He compares the work to gaming, stating that it does not feel like work when you are doing something you love.
Deedy Das, a partner at Menlo Ventures, disagrees with the notion that long working hours are necessary for success, citing the potential for burnout and the importance of work-life balance.
Das believes that young entrepreneurs often mistakenly associate long working hours with productivity, leading to an unhealthy work environment.

He argues that forcing employees to work long hours can lead to a range of negative consequences, including the loss of experienced workers and those with families.
Das emphasizes that continual long hours can result in burnout and decreased productivity in the long run.
However, he acknowledges that company founders may need to work long hours, given their personal investment in the business and the potential for significant financial gains.
Das states that he would be surprised if a founder were not working 70-80 hours per week, considering the high stakes and potential rewards.
Tamara Myles, an academic and author on workplace culture, argues that the hustle culture is unsustainable and can have negative consequences for individuals who feel pressured to work constantly.
Myles notes that some tech companies openly promote the 996 culture as a badge of honor, but this does not necessarily mean that all employees who work long hours do so voluntarily.
She suggests that power dynamics may be at play, with some individuals feeling forced to work long hours due to job market pressures or visa requirements.
Myles warns that those who choose to work excessively long hours may ultimately pay a heavy price, both physically and mentally.
The health consequences of prolonged working hours have long been a concern. In Japan, a nation known for its strong work ethic, the term "Karōshi" is used to describe death caused by overwork, typically resulting from strokes and heart attacks.
Another related term, "Karōjisatsu," refers to instances of suicide or attempted suicide stemming from workplace stress. Both conditions are acknowledged in Japanese law, with families potentially eligible for government compensation, although proving a direct link between death and overwork can be challenging.
The Japanese government has established a scheme to provide compensation to families affected by Karōshi and Karōjisatsu, but the process of proving a causal link between overwork and death can be difficult.
A joint analysis by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Labour Organization (ILO) in 2021 found that working long hours, defined as more than 55 hours per week, was associated with 745,000 deaths worldwide from stroke and heart disease in 2016.
The study revealed that working 55 hours or more per week increases the risk of heart disease by 17% and stroke by 35% compared to working 35-40 hours per week.
Productivity, or the amount of work accomplished per hour, is also affected by the number of hours worked.
Research has shown that as working hours increase, productivity initially rises but then declines as workers experience physical and mental exhaustion. The optimal threshold for productivity is generally considered to be around 40 hours per week.
A recent study noted that workers can maintain productivity at around 40 hours per week, but exceeding this threshold leads to decreased job performance due to fatigue and poor health.
Once the 40-hour threshold is exceeded, the output generated by each additional hour worked begins to decrease.
Companies may be tempted to reduce their workforce and increase working hours to minimize costs, as hiring and training new employees can be expensive.
However, research suggests that this approach can be counterproductive, as Michigan State University found that an employee working 70 hours per week may not produce significantly more than one working 50 hours per week.

The concept of a standard 40-hour workweek was pioneered by Henry Ford in the early 20th century, who implemented a five-day, 40-hour schedule for his factory workers.
Some argue that British companies could learn from the approaches adopted by US tech companies.
James Watt, co-founder and former CEO of BrewDog, has suggested that the concept of work-life balance is outdated and that people who enjoy their work do not need to separate their personal and professional lives.
Watt cited a study by King's College London, which found that people in the UK are among the least likely to prioritize work above other aspects of their lives.
In a 2022 BBC documentary, Watt faced allegations of inappropriate behavior and abuse of power in the workplace, to which he apologized, while also denying "false rumors and misinformation."
BrewDog's current CEO, James Taylor, has stated that the company has moved past its previous controversies.
The notion of a "996 culture" may seem familiar to some in the UK, where certain industries are known for demanding long working hours.

A survey by Legal Cheek found that many corporate law firms in the UK require long working hours, with average working days often exceeding 12 hours.
The investment banking sector is also notorious for its demanding work schedule, with industry sources suggesting that 65-70 hours per week is common, and can reach up to 100 hours during peak periods.
Under UK law, employees are generally not required to work more than 48 hours per week, but they can opt out of this limit if they choose to do so.
Ben Wilmott, head of public policy at the CIPD, argues that there is no correlation between working long hours and increased productivity.
Wilmott notes that working long hours can lead to health risks, including a higher risk of stroke and heart disease, and suggests that companies should focus on improving management and technology to boost productivity rather than increasing working hours.
Instead of emphasizing longer working hours, Wilmott advocates for a "smarter" approach to work, leveraging technology and AI to enhance productivity.
Some campaigners argue that reducing working hours and adopting a four-day week could have benefits for the UK.

A 2022 pilot project involving 61 organizations found that reducing working hours without cutting pay led to decreased stress and illness, improved staff retention, and maintained productivity.
The pilot project's results suggest that a shorter working week can have positive effects on both employees and employers.
According to recruitment expert Adrian Kinnersley, the enthusiasm for a "996 culture" is largely confined to the tech sector.
Kinnersley believes that competing with companies that have a more relaxed, 35-hour workweek culture would be challenging in the current environment.
Magnus Müller, founder of Browser-Use, views the working hours in Silicon Valley as relatively moderate compared to other industries.
Müller draws a comparison between the tech industry and farming, where workers often labor for over 12 hours a day, seven days a week, without holidays.
Müller suggests that the tech industry's working hours are relatively mild compared to other sectors, where workers face more demanding conditions.
Image credit: Getty.
Business
Artist Alleges AirAsia Used His Work Without Permission
A street artist from Penang has reported that one of his artworks has been replicated and featured on the design of an airplane.
A lawsuit has been filed by a Malaysian-based artist against AirAsia and its parent company, Capital A Berhad, alleging unauthorized use of the artist's designs on one of the airline's planes.

According to the lawsuit, Ernest Zacharevic, a Lithuanian-born artist residing in Penang, claims that his 2012 street mural, Kids on Bicycle, was reproduced and displayed on an AirAsia aircraft in late 2024 without his permission.
Zacharevic states that the use of his design was unauthorized, and no licensing agreement or consent was obtained, adding that the livery was removed after he publicly expressed concerns about the matter.
The BBC has reached out to AirAsia for a statement regarding the allegations.
In an interview with the BBC on Thursday, Zacharevic recalled that he first became aware of the alleged copyright infringement in October 2024, when he discovered that an AirAsia plane was featuring a livery resembling his artwork.
With over a decade of experience in Malaysia, Zacharevic is known for his roadside murals in Penang, which have become a staple of the local art scene.
One of Zacharevic's notable works is the 2012 street mural Kids on Bicycle, created for a local festival, which features two children on a bicycle integrated into the mural, located in George Town's heritage district.
The mural has become a popular tourist attraction, with many visitors taking photos in front of the iconic artwork.
Zacharevic alleges that his work was reproduced on an AirAsia plane without his knowledge or consent, and he personally witnessed the plane in operation at an airport.
Recalling the incident, Zacharevic expressed his discomfort with the situation, which occurred in 2024.
He took to social media to address the issue, posting a photo of the plane and tagging the airline, suggesting that they needed to discuss the use of his artwork.

Since then, Zacharevic has engaged in discussions with the company, but they have been unable to come to a mutually agreeable resolution.
This is not the first instance of Zacharevic's work being used in connection with AirAsia, as he claims the airline has also used his artwork on a delivery bag for its food services arm.
Court documents reveal that Zacharevic had previously discussed a potential collaboration with AirAsia in 2017, where he would create art for the airline's jets and a mural in one of their offices.
According to the documents, Zacharevic had informed the airline of his work and business rates during these discussions.
The lawsuit asserts that despite being aware of Zacharevic's work and rates, the airline proceeded to reproduce and publicly display one of his notable works, thereby infringing on his copyright and moral rights.
As the largest low-cost carrier in Asia, AirAsia operates over 200 jets to more than 100 destinations, and has recently announced plans to resume flights from Kuala Lumpur to London via Bahrain.
Zacharevic has stated that he will leave it to the court to determine any potential compensation he may be entitled to.
The artist emphasized that he does not consider the use of his artwork to be a mere reference to cultural or geographical associations, but rather a distinct artistic creation.
Zacharevic stressed that his artwork is the result of years of professional training, skill, and labor, and should be recognized as such.
Business
US Businesses and Consumers Bear Brunt of Trump Tariff Costs, According to NY Fed
In 2022, the United States saw a significant increase in collective import tariff rates, with rates rising by more than 300 percent for a range of imported goods.
The modification of tariff agreements by President Donald Trump with several countries had a consistent outcome: increased costs for US-based companies and consumers.

According to a study released on Thursday by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the average tariff rate on imported goods increased significantly, rising from 2.6% at the beginning of the year to 13% in 2025.
The New York Fed's research revealed that US companies absorbed approximately 90% of the costs associated with the higher tariffs imposed by Trump on goods from countries such as Mexico, China, Canada, and the European Union.
The Federal Reserve Bank of New York stated that "the majority of the economic burden of the high tariffs imposed in 2025 continues to be borne by US firms and consumers."
When tariff rates changed and increased in the previous year, exporting countries did not adjust their prices to mitigate potential declines in US demand.
Instead of lowering prices, exporters maintained their existing prices and transferred the tariff costs to US importers, who subsequently increased the prices of these goods for consumers.
The response of exporters in 2025 was similar to their reaction in 2018, when Trump introduced certain tariffs during his first term, resulting in higher consumer prices with minimal other economic effects, as noted by the New York Fed at the time.
The New York Fed's findings on Thursday are consistent with the results of other recent analyses.
The Kiel Institute for the World Economy, a German research organization, reported last month that its research indicated "nearly complete pass-through of tariffs to US import prices."
By analyzing 25 million transactions, Kiel researchers discovered that the prices of goods from countries like Brazil and India did not decrease.
The Kiel report noted that "trade volumes declined" instead, indicating that exporters preferred to reduce the quantity of goods shipped to the US rather than lower their prices.
The National Bureau of Economic Research also found that the pass-through of tariffs to US import prices was "nearly 100%", meaning that the US bears the cost of the price increase, not the exporting countries.
Similarly, the Tax Foundation, a Washington DC-based think tank, found that the increased tariffs on goods in 2025 resulted in higher costs for American households.
The Tax Foundation considered tariffs as a new tax on consumers and estimated that the 2025 increases resulted in an average cost of $1,000 (£734.30) per household, with a projected cost of $1,300 in 2026.
The Tax Foundation reported that the "effective" tariff rate, which accounts for decreased consumer purchases due to higher prices, is now 9.9%, representing the highest average rate since 1946.
The Tax Foundation concluded that the economic benefits of tax cuts included in Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" will be entirely offset by the impacts of the tariffs on households.
Business
BBC Reporter Exposed to Cyber Attack Due to Vulnerabilities in AI Coding Tool
The demand for vibe-coding tools, which enable individuals without coding experience to develop applications using artificial intelligence, is experiencing rapid growth.
A significant and unresolved cyber-security vulnerability has been identified in a popular AI coding platform, according to information provided to the BBC.

The platform, known as Orchids, utilizes a "vibe-coding" approach, enabling individuals without technical expertise to create apps and games by inputting text prompts into a chatbot.
In recent months, such platforms have gained widespread popularity, often being touted as an early example of how AI can rapidly and affordably perform various professional tasks.
However, experts warn that the ease with which Orchids can be compromised highlights the risks associated with granting AI bots extensive access to computers in exchange for autonomous task execution.
Despite repeated requests for comment, the company has not responded to the BBC's inquiries.
Orchids claims to have a user base of one million and boasts partnerships with top companies, including Google, Uber, and Amazon.
According to ratings from App Bench and other analysts, Orchids is considered the top program for certain aspects of vibe coding.
Cyber-security researcher Etizaz Mohsin demonstrated the platform's security flaws to the BBC.
To test the platform's security, a spare laptop was used to download the Orchids desktop app and initiate a vibe-coding project.
A request was made to the Orchids AI assistant to generate code for a computer game based on the BBC News website.

The AI assistant automatically compiled code on the screen, which, without prior experience, was unintelligible.
By exploiting a specific cyber-security weakness, Mohsin was able to access the project and view and edit the code.
Mohsin then added a line of code to the project, which went unnoticed.
This action apparently allowed him to gain access to the computer, as evidenced by the subsequent appearance of a "Joe is hacked" notepad file on the desktop and a changed wallpaper featuring an AI hacker image.
The potential implications of this hack on the platform's numerous projects are significant.
A malicious hacker could have easily installed a virus on the machine without any action required from the victim.
Sensitive personal or financial data could have been compromised.
An attacker could have accessed internet history or even used the computer's cameras and microphones for surveillance.
Most cyber-attacks involve tricking victims into downloading malicious software or divulging login credentials.
This particular attack was carried out without any involvement from the victim, known as a zero-click attack.
Mohsin stated that the vibe-coding revolution has introduced a new class of security vulnerabilities that did not previously exist, highlighting the risks associated with relying on AI to handle tasks.
The concept of AI handling tasks autonomously comes with significant risks, according to Mohsin.
Mohsin, a 32-year-old from Pakistan currently residing in the UK, has a history of discovering dangerous software flaws, including work on the Pegasus spyware.

Mohsin discovered the flaw in December 2025 while experimenting with vibe-coding and has since attempted to contact Orchids through various channels, sending around a dozen messages.
The Orchids team responded to Mohsin this week, stating that they may have missed his warnings due to being overwhelmed with incoming messages.
According to the company's LinkedIn page, Orchids is a San Francisco-based company founded in 2025 with fewer than 10 employees.
Mohsin has only identified flaws in Orchids and not in other vibe-coding platforms, such as Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, and Lovable.
Nonetheless, experts caution that this discovery should serve as a warning.
Professor Kevin Curran of Ulster University's cybersecurity department notes that the main security implications of vibe-coding are the potential for code to fail under attack due to a lack of discipline, documentation, and review.
Agentic AI tools, which perform complex tasks with minimal human input, are increasingly gaining attention.
A recent example is the Clawbot agent, also known as Moltbot or Open Claw, which can execute tasks on a user's device with little human intervention.
The free AI agent has been downloaded by hundreds of thousands of people, granting it deep access to computers and potentially introducing numerous security risks.
Karolis Arbaciauskas, head of product at NordPass, advises caution when using such tools.
Arbaciauskas warns that while it may be intriguing to see what an AI agent can do without security measures, this level of access is also highly insecure.
He recommends running these tools on separate, dedicated machines and using disposable accounts for experimentation.
To stay informed about the latest tech stories and trends, sign up for the Tech Decoded newsletter, available outside the UK as well.
(Removed to maintain the same number of paragraphs)

-
News8 hours agoAustralian Politics Faces Questions Over Gender Equality Amid Sussan Ley’s Appointment
-
News5 hours agoFarage Says Reform to Replace Traditional Tory Party
-
News5 hours agoWrexham Pair Seek Win Against Former Team Ipswich
-
News11 hours agoLiberal Party Removes Australia’s First Female Leader
-
News8 hours agoUK Braces for Cold Snap with Snow and Ice Alerts Expected
-
News5 hours agoHusband’s alleged £600k theft for sex and antiques blamed on drug side effects
-
Business11 hours agoBBC Reporter Exposed to Cyber Attack Due to Vulnerabilities in AI Coding Tool
-
News8 hours agoCanadian Town Unites in Mourning After Mass Shooting Leaves Community Reeling
